There's a lot of debate going on these days about whether content mill writers who work for $15/article or less are damaging the writing market as a whole. Since I'm fortunate enough to still have enough work coming in at much higher rates, I tend to side with the live and let livers. That, however, doesn't mean I don't still market for new work. It's here where I'm starting to see a trend I don't particularly like, which may soon have me becoming more vocally against low-pay writers. Here's a stunning example of why.
What Happens When I Apply for an Article Writing Position in One of My Specialty Areas in Which the Compensation is Listed as "Depends on credentials"I receive the response, "Our compensation is $10 per 500 words and an additional $5.00 for the posting requirement. We will also feature you in our 'Contributing Writer's' section and promote you through our site. In the spring when we begin our book process, we would like to include you, your writing and your expertise for further compensation to be discussed at that time. Eventually when we have established ourselves a little bit more, we would like to bring on 3-4 staff writers on a permanent basis with a set monthly compensation. Does this sound like something that interests you?"
What Happens When I Respond with, "Thanks, but no thanks. The rates you offer are way below professional standards."By all accounts I should have been, and fully expected to be, written off. Apparently, however, my credentials impressed the job poster enough to write me back to ask what I normally charge.
What Happens When I Enlighten This Job Poster and Offer a Compromise, Short-Term RateI am shocked to receive yet another, apologetic, reply: "Thank you so much for your response. I hope I didn't offend you earlier. I was basing rates on responses that I had received earlier in the day. You are obviously very well experienced and qualified and I would love to have you write for us in the future. Maybe in a few months, once the market picks up a little and I have a bit more working capital, I can give you a call?"
I don't know yet whether I should laugh or cry about this situation. That several people beat me to the punch with content-mill-type rates, thereby setting the compensation standard this client was willing to offer, makes me want to cry. And yet, my experience and the quality of my samples still elevated me above them enough to make this potential client still want to work with me down the road, despite being able to get content much cheaper elsewhere.
Of course, it's a longshot this scenario will actually turn into paid work. And there's also the fact that it's a very isolated incident. Most other job posters will be more than willing to take on the lowballers regardless of their professional record.
I'm still undecided, but does this story alter your perception on the controversy?
Labels: discussions, rants